Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparison of Flow-Through Cell and Paddle Methods for Testing Vaginal Tablets Containing a Poorly Water-Soluble Drug

Emilia Szymanska, Emilia Szymanska, Katarzyna Winnicka , Katarzyna Winnicka ,

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Bialystok, Mickiewicza 2c, 15-222 Bialystok, Poland;

For correspondence:-  Katarzyna Winnicka   Email: kwin@umb.edu.pl   Tel:+48857485616

Received: 31 January 2012        Accepted: 26 November 2012        Published: 21 February 2013

Citation: Szymanska E, Szymanska E, Winnicka K, Winnicka K, Comparison of Flow-Through Cell and Paddle Methods for Testing Vaginal Tablets Containing a Poorly Water-Soluble Drug. Trop J Pharm Res 2013; 12(1):39-44 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i1.7

© 2013 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of the flow-through cell apparatus for testing commercial vaginal tablets containing poorly water-soluble clotrimazole.
Methods: The effect of experimental conditions (type of dissolution medium, flow rate and positioning of the tablet) on the dissolution profile of clotrimazole were examined and optimal parameters for conducting the experiments were determined. The amount of drug released was analyzed by high performance chromatography (HPLC) at 210 nm. The usefulness of the flow-through cell apparatus was compared to FDA recommended paddle apparatus.  
Results: Using acetate buffer pH 5.2 containing 1 % SDS, both methods gave different dissolution profiles. The paddle apparatus tended to give faster rate of dissolution (approx. 88.5 % during the first 20 min of the experiment), which was probably caused by higher agitation and greater surface area of the drug-dissolution medium in a vessel. In the flow-through cell method, total drug release was definitely slower and was observed after 2 to 5 h; at a flow rate of 16 ml/min, more than 80 % of the drug dissolved after 30 min of the test. It was noticed that raising the flow rate of the dissolution medium caused significantly higher drug release.
Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the flow-through cell method is reproducible and can be successfully used for evaluating in vitro dissolution of clotrimazole from non-modified release tablets. The slower rate of dissolution obtained in the flow-through cell method would help to distinguish between different formulations.

Keywords: Dissolution test, Flow-through cell method, Paddle method, Clotrimazole

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates